Fair student placement

José Alcalde


We revisit the concept of fairness in the Student Placement framework. We declare an allocation as α-equitable if no agent can propose an alternative allocation that nobody else might argue to be inequitable. It turns out that α-equity is compatible with efficiency. Our analysis fills a gap in the literature by giving normative support to the allocations improving, in terms of efficiency, the Student Optimal Stable allocation.

Cited By

  1. Afacan, M.O. and U.M. Dur (2020): "Constrained stability in two-sided matching markets," Social Choice and Welfare, forthcoming.
  2. Alcalde, J. and J.A. Silva-Reus (2013): "Allocating via priorities." QM&ET Working Paper no. 13-03.
  3. Alcalde, J. and B. Subiza (2014): "Affirmative action and school choice," International Journal of Economic Theory 10, p. 295-312.
  4. Ayoade, N. (2020): Theoretical studies on the design of school choice mechanisms. PhD Dissertation, Concordia University.
  5. Ayoade, N. and S. Papai (2018): "Degrees of stability in matching." Mimeographed, Concordia University.
  6. Cantala, D. and S. Pápai (2014): "Reasonably and securely stable matching." Mimeographed, El Colegio de México.
  7. Delacrétaz, D. (2019): "Stability in matching markets with sizes." Mimeographed, University of Oxford.
  8. Doğan, B. (2016): "Responsive affirmative action in school choice," Journal of Economic Theory 165, p. 69-105.
  9. Dur, U.M., A.A. Gitmez and O. Yilmaz (2019): "School choice under partial fairness," Theoretical Economics 14, p. 1309-1346.
  10. Dur, U.M. and T. Morrill (2020): "What you don't know can help you in school assignment," Games and Economic Behavior 120, p. 246-256.
  11. Ehlers, L. (2011): "School choice with control." Mimeographed, University of Montreal.
  12. Ehlers, L., I.E. Hafalir, M.B. Yenmez and M.A. Yildirim (2014): "School choice with controlled choice constraints: Hard bounds versus soft bounds," Journal of Economic Theory 153, p. 648-683.
  13. Ehlers, L. and T. Morrill (2020): "(Il)legal assignments in School Choice," Review of Economic Studies 87, p. 1837-1875.
  14. Fragiadakis, D., A. Iwasaki, P. Troyan, S. Ueda and M. Yokoo (2015): "Strategyproof matching with minimum quotas," ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, Volume 4 Issue 1, Article No. 6.
  15. Ghasvareh, P. (2019): Fairness Comparisons of matching rules. PhD Dissertation, Concordia University.
  16. Han, X. (2018): "Stable and efficient resource allocation under weak priorities," Games and Economic Behavior 107, p. 1-20.
  17. Jiang, Y-P. and D-N. Yuan (2020): "Surgeon-patient matching based on pairwise comparisons information for elective surgery," Computers & Industrial Engineering, forthcoming.
  18. Kloosterman, A. and P. Troyan (2016): "Efficient and essentially stable assignments." Mimeographed, University of Virginia.
  19. Morrill, T. (2017): "Petty envy when assigning objects" Mimeographed, North Carolina State University.
  20. Morrill, T. (2016): "Which school assignments are legal?" Mimeographed, North Carolina State University.
  21. Tang, Q. and Y. Zhang (2020): "Weak stability and Pareto efficiency in school choice," Economic Theory, forthcoming.
  22. Troyan, P., D. Delacrétaz and A. Kloosterman (2020): "Essentially stable matchings," Games and Economic Behavior 120, p. 370-390.
  23. Troyan, P. and T. Morrill (2020): "Obvious manipulations," Journal of Economic Theory 185, art. 104970.
  24. Woodward, K. (2019): "Self-auditable auctions." Mimeographed, UNC at Chapel Hill.
  25. Wu, M.-J. (2020): "Predicting outcomes of school-choice policies using district characteristics: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong," Journal of School Choice, forthcoming.
  26. Yilmaz, M. and Ö Yilmaz (2016): "The bargaining set of an exchange economy with discrete resources," Mimeographed, Bogazçi University.

Last update: July 2020